dear barack obama,
Everyone’s wondering who you’ll pick as your running mate. I must admit, I’m quite curious as well. Both you and McCain face a wide-open field of candidates and big deficiencies with the electorate that you’re going to need to account for. I feel pretty confident that your worthy adversary, John McCain, will end up picking Romney. After all he’s young, and he’s got very solid economic credentials– both significant challenges for the Honorable Senator from Arizona.
Your biggest issue with the undecideds is likely your youth, and by virtue of that, relative inexperience. People really freak out about inexperience when they’re talking national security and foreign policy, so picking a relative grey-hair who has good foreign policy credentials is kind of all the more important. But I want you to go beyond that. If America is going to regain her footing in a tough world out there, we’re going to need to stop the internal squabbling. Stopping our petty infighting will be no small matter, and in fact, on it’s face, seems impossible. But you’re saying all the right things and have thus far relatively avoided fanning the flames of partisanship. Now, I want you to take it one step further:
Pick Chuck Hagel as your running-mate.
That’s right, Chuck Hagel, R-Nebraska. He’s got the foreign policy experience and you share common ground on some issues (immigration, the war in Iraq) and differ on others (environment, abortion, etc). But Chuck Hagel gets what’s eating away at America: partisanship and the two-party system as a whole. And the fact that you disagree with Hagel on many issues is a great thing. It will mean that there will be a diverse discussion inside the White House, and the eventual policies and bills that a Obama-Hagel administration (assuming you used him as more than a token) supports, would, for once, actually mirror the positions of most Americans. Most of us, as you know, aren’t extremists on the issues. It’s just that we’ve been forced to the edges, and had to pick sides. This is a first step to stopping that BS.
If we’re going to truly enact any kind of change, we need to stop being our own worst enemy. Democrats and Republicans arguing over the stupidest stuff enrages me. It’s like a married couple arguing about their kid’s bed time while he’s outside playing in traffic, about to get hit by a car. Anyway, I’m in danger of digression, and I get that you’re busy writing notes to Scarlet.
Throw America a bone? Hagel?
Wait a minute…Hagel’s policies are also far from Senator McCain’s policies. Maybe he can choose him and that would be close to a bi-partisan ticket. Maybe I should write him a let….
Love,
surya
P.S. Hagel! Hagel! Hagel!
5 Responses
Raja Devineni
June 16th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
1Nooooooooo to Chuck Hagel. Obama is going to win no matter who the VP is and is probably looking at a dem controlled congress and senate. No reason to risk alienating the energized democratic base by picking a republican.
Hagel will be too much of a doubter when it comes to “liberal policies” like universal healthcare(just an assumption, not sure where Hagel stands on healthcare). The last thing Obama needs is a VP who isn’t commited 100% into his idealogy.
I really don’t think it matters who Obama picks for his VP. Obama is going to be the reason why people vote (or not) for him. The VP post, for election purposes, on the Obama ticket is fairly ceremonial, I think. That said, I would definitely NOT pick the following;
1. Hillary(Too many negatives)
2. Edwards(Should have never got that haircut)
3. Gore(The ticket will be charaterized a too Liberal)
4. Chuck Hagel or any other republican (Because he doesn’t need to)
He should just pick Wesley Clark or any other retired general and get it over with. The biggest advantage of that is the VP pick will (probaly)not be a target of attack by the repubs and right now(and going forward) the Obama camp can use a little non-attacking by the republicans so that they can campaign. And we all know what happens when Obama campaigns, he turns doubters into beleivers( ask Iowans or Hillary if you don’t believe me)
surya.yalamanchili
June 16th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
2If he wasn’t going to pick a Republican, and specifically, Hagel, I’d definitely agree with Clark. In fact, I assume he’ll end up here. He has to pick someone with really strong foreign policy credentials, and Clark is a DLC moderate as well. We’ll see…
Charlie
June 16th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
3I think you’ve got a great idea!
Megan
June 18th, 2008 at 9:10 am
4My world is so limited. All I was hoping for that he’d choose Hillary, but it might become a fiesta for the media seeing who between them is *really* in the role of president.
Rodney F
July 8th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
5Surya - once again you nail it on the head. The biggest problem today with American politics is that it has gotten so partisan that nothing can get done. A symbolic move as you describe, to fight against that transformation, would get my vote.
The two parties are so viscerally opposed that no one compromises or builds alliances. I’ve been told this by my friends on the Hill, past and present. Not sure who or what to blame. Maybe the spirit of the 1990s, the freshman Republican class of 1994, Rush Limbaugh, gotcha journalism, who knows? I recommend reading James Baker’s latest book for an illustration of how politics used to be, and should be again.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Surya is...
an Internet entrepreneur turned Brand Manager. I've “returned” to my roots and today focus on emerging media strategy. And strange as it is, if I look familiar its because I was on the TV show The Apprentice. And, yes, I know it was terrible.
Click here for my bio.
Calendar
surya yalamanchili’s weblog is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease